Research · Society and rights
Gender equality or gender justice?
Much modern policy treats fairness as identical treatment for men and women. The authors argue Islam aims instead at justice: equal worth, with some duties assigned differently.
Summary
In brief
When people argue about women and religion, a great deal depends on what “equality” means. In much modern policy language, and in a liberal tradition running from John Stuart Mill to Susan Moller Okin and Martha Nussbaum, equality means sameness: men and women should have identical rights and roles, and any rule that treats them differently is presumed unfair. Many Muslim scholars prefer another vocabulary, justice (ʿadl) and equity (qist), meaning giving each person what is due to them, which is not always the same thing.
The paper separates equal worth from identical function. On worth, it argues, the Qur'an is explicit: men and women come “from one soul” (4:1), “you are of one another” (3:195), believing men and women are promised the same forgiveness and reward (33:35), and the measure of honour is taqwa, or God-consciousness, not gender (49:13). A hadith calls women “the counterparts (twin halves) of men”. Where the law does treat them differently, mainly in the family, the authors argue the differences are tied to responsibility, not superiority, and should be read through the maqasid al-shari'ah, the higher aims of Islamic law such as protecting life, family and dignity. On that reading, any practice that leads to coercion or harm goes against the law's own purposes.
Two case studies carry the argument. On inheritance, the paper notes that the “two to one” rule of 4:11 applies only in certain family situations; citing Egypt's Dar al-Ifta, it says women sometimes inherit equally, sometimes more, and sometimes when a comparable male relative receives nothing. A woman's inheritance stays her own, while a man must pay dower and support his wife, children and, when needed, his parents. On qiwamah, the role of men as “maintainers/protectors” in 4:34, the authors read the verse alongside the Qur'an's description of marriage as affection and mercy (30:21) and the command to “live with them in kindness” (4:19). They describe it as responsibility-based leadership tied to providing for the family, within a wider web of care from father to husband to son, and point to the hadith that names the mother first as most deserving of good companionship. Engaging Muslim feminist writers such as Amina Wadud, Asma Barlas and Fatima Mernissi, they too separate revelation from patriarchal cultural practice.
The authors conclude that Islamic ethics can give strong protection to women's dignity and rights without adopting a “sameness” model, provided men's responsibilities are actually enforced and harmful applications are rejected.
Key points
What the paper argues
- 01The authors argue Islam affirms equal spiritual worth and moral agency for men and women.
- 02Differences in family law are tied to responsibility and welfare, not to male superiority.
- 03The two-to-one inheritance rule applies only in some cases and comes with men's duty to provide.
- 04Qiwamah is read as accountable leadership and service, never a licence for harm.
The paper
Gender Equality vs. Gender Justice: An Islamic Ethical Perspective
Authors
Muhammad Ismail Aarifi, Muhammad Harris Suhaib
Published
Policy Research Journal, 2 June 2026
Read the full paper
This page is our summary. The paper itself sets out the full argument with its sources.